Most clients I have so far (earlier simple_client that I modified,
QJackConnect 0.0.3b and qjackctl: 0.2.14) don't seem to take jack server name as argument. But looking at the new simple_client.c from jack-audio-connection-kit 0.100.0, [1], I understand one should be able to connect to a specific server when several are running. Is there any support on the server side to connect sound from a port in one server to a port in another server? I understand it might be difficult to make connected servers run in sync. I am not having any particular super-low latency demands on this. Maybe this is completely a client side task to carry out. mmm I think I know how I could do it... [1] jack_client_open (client_name, options, &status, server_name) Thanks, -- Jonas Widarsson tel: +46 271 152 00 - tel: +46 271 121 42 (hemma/home) - gsm: +46 70 539 64 79 MSN: [hidden email] ICQ: 72016688 jabber: [hidden email] ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Jackit-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jackit-devel |
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 19:05 +0200, Jonas Widarsson wrote:
> Most clients I have so far (earlier simple_client that I modified, > QJackConnect 0.0.3b and qjackctl: 0.2.14) don't seem to take jack server name > as argument. But looking at the new simple_client.c from > jack-audio-connection-kit 0.100.0, [1], I understand one should be able to > connect to a specific server when several are running. > > Is there any support on the server side to connect sound from a port in one > server to a port in another server? > > I understand it might be difficult to make connected servers run in sync. > I am not having any particular super-low latency demands on this. > > Maybe this is completely a client side task to carry out. mmm I think I know > how I could do it... correct. this is not part of the plan at all as far as jack infrastructure. most people, in fact, almost everyone, has no reason to be running multiple JACK servers on a single machine. be aware that you will need buffering in any connecting client, because the two jackd's will probably not be running in sync. --p ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Jackit-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jackit-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |